Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Idgah case
Quick Understanding
The next date of this case’s hearing has been set for August 12, after the High Court’s decision on the suits’ maintainability. The High Court will now settle the issues of disagreement, and a trial will be conducted on them.
What is Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Idgah dispute?
This is a disagreement about the demolition of Shahi Masjid Idgah, which is next to Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi. A deal on stamp paper for Rs. 2.50 was agreed upon in 1968 between Shahi Masjid Idgah Committee and Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Seva Sangh.
According to this, the Shahi Masjid Committee obtained approximately 2.5 acres of the 13.37 acres of land that were claimed to belong to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust. This agreement is being challenged in court by the Hindu side.
In Shorts
- Quick Understanding
- What is Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Idgah dispute?
- Will Hindu challenge the Waqf Board’s argument?
- The Eidgah Committee clarified its next move to the Supreme Court after reviewing the order.
Also Read: top-10-biggest-hindu-temples-in-the-world/
Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Idgah case
The Hindu side argues that Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust is the original organization associated with the birthplace.
The trust founded Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Seva Sangh solely for supervision. Seva Sangh signed an unverified agreement despite having no statutory or administrative rights to the land. The land of Janmabhoomi should be returned by the court by voiding it.
The next date of this case’s hearing has been set for August 12, after the High Court issued a decision on Thursday (1-Aug-2024) about the suits’ maintainability in the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Idgah issue.
On this date, the court will make decisions about the case’s issues. These points alone will be the focus of the case trial. The Janmabhoomi side will additionally present an application to the court, addressing multiple of the case’s issues. The court will also add them as subjects of the case if considered as relevant.
The president of Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Mukti Nyas, Mahendra Pratap Singh, stated that the Hindu side’s evidence provided to the court had played an important part in the Janmabhoomi side’s victory.
These included the ASI survey report, all of the history books, the Municipal Corporation’s assessment, and the revenue records for the Katra Keshavdev property.
It got brought up at the High Court on February 22, 2024, and stated that whether the Sunni Central Waqf Board or the Idgah Committee had genuine records relating to the Idgah Mosque.
He explained, The Places of Worship Act and the Limitation Act are not relevant in this instance. In addition, no Waqf Board decision has been made that prevents the original Lord Krishna sanctum sanctorum from being demolished. There is not a single authentic document related to the Idgah that is in the control of both the Sunni Central Waqf Board or the Idgah Committee.
Also Read:Sky Force Movie : Action Drama – Based on True Event, Story Line, Review, Cast & Release Date
Will Hindu challenge the Waqf Board’s argument?
No Waqf property registered in the name of Shahi Idgah Mosque appears in the ASI’s records as explained the president and party of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Mukti Nyas. In response to his RTI, the Waqf Survey Commissioner, Lucknow office, has acknowledged this.
On the other hand, the Waqf Board is arguing as a respondent in these kinds of cases. On August 12, the Waqf Board will be facing a legal challenge to the constitutionality of their argument, claiming that they cannot make an argument if the land in dispute is not their own. There shall be a filed application with supporting documentation.
The Eidgah Committee clarified its next move to the Supreme Court after reviewing the order
Regarding the High Court’s decision on Thursday, Tanveer Ahmed, the secretary of the Shahi Jama Masjid Eidgah Committee and a party counsel, stated that he would carefully examine the copy of the verdict upon getting it. About this order, he is going to the Supreme Court.
He claimed that the action is now maintainable because of the court’s prolonged decision. The suitability of the outfits has been questioned by the Eidgah Committee. In court, an extensive amount of evidence was also offered to support this. Both parties engaged in an extended legal dispute.
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
